EN
FR - French AR - Arabic EN - English

2026 World Cup: South Africa's qualification scenarios for the round of 32

What Bafana Bafana need to secure their spot
Africa
Add Foot Africa on Google
2026 World Cup: South Africa's qualification scenarios for the round of 32
South Africa/@FIFA
24.06.26 FT World Cup
South Africa
1
:
South Korea
0

Bottom of Group A, South Africa still have a fighting chance to qualify for the round of 32 at the World Cup ahead of the third matchday. Here’s a look at the different qualification scenarios facing Bafana Bafana.

After suffering a 2-0 defeat to Mexico in the tournament opener, Hugo Broos' squad were held to a 1-1 draw by the Czech Republic. Their hopes now rest on the final Group A match against South Korea this Thursday at 1 a.m. GMT.

World Cup 2026: The official and complete group stage schedule

Bafana Bafana currently sit fourth in Group A with 1 point and a negative goal difference (-2), trailing Mexico (6 pts), South Korea (3 pts), and the Czech Republic (1 pt, -1).

South Africa

While the top spot in the group is already locked in for Mexico after two wins, South Africa can still hope to finish second—or grab a place among the best third-placed teams from the 12 groups.

South Africa will qualify as group runners-up if:

- They beat South Korea and the Czech Republic draw or lose against Mexico.

- They beat South Korea and finish with a better goal difference than the Czech Republic if both win (currently -1 for the Czechs and -2 for Bafana Bafana).

South Africa can still qualify as one of the best third-placed teams if:

- They beat South Korea but have an inferior goal difference compared to the Czech Republic if both win (currently -1 for the Czechs and -2 for Bafana Bafana).

- They draw with South Korea and the Czech Republic lose to Mexico, but then must hope that eight other third-placed teams across the groups do not outperform them.

Here’s a reminder of the current best third-placed standings:

1. Sweden (3 points): 6 goals scored, 6 conceded (goal difference +0).

2. Scotland (3 points): 1 goal scored, 1 conceded (goal difference +0).

3. Croatia (3 points): 3 goals scored, 4 conceded (goal difference -1).

4. Algeria (3 points): 2 goals scored, 4 conceded (goal difference -2).

5. Paraguay (3 points): 2 goals scored, 4 conceded (goal difference -2).

6. Cape Verde (2 points): 2 goals scored, 2 conceded (goal difference +0).

7. Belgium (2 points): 1 goal scored, 1 conceded (goal difference +0).

8. Czech Republic (1 point): 2 goals scored, 3 conceded (goal difference -1).

9. DR Congo (1 point): 1 goal scored, 2 conceded (goal difference -1).

10. Ecuador (1 point): 0 goals scored, 1 conceded (goal difference -1).

11. Bosnia and Herzegovina (1 point): 2 goals scored, 5 conceded (goal difference -3).

12. Senegal (0 points): 3 goals scored, 6 conceded (goal difference -3).

Imed Ben Amara

Imed Ben Amara |

Editorar, fr

Imed Ben Amara - bilingual sports writer and web editor with experience in football content creation. Since 2021, he has contributed to Foot Africa, providing news coverage and analysis.

Exclusive Interviews
Comments
Only registered users can leave or reply to comments.