Noble Mendy at the heart of the Arsenal and Hull controversy.. Was a penalty canceled due to offside before the foul occurred?
Senegal international Nobel Mendy found himself at the centre of a major refereeing controversy on Saturday 7 November 2026 after Arsenal were denied a penalty against Hull City despite the referee acknowledging that the defender had fouled Kai Havertz inside the penalty area.
The incident occurred in the 42nd minute at the Emirates Stadium with the score still 0-0. Mendy pulled Havertz's shirt as the Arsenal forward attempted to attack an incoming delivery.
Following a VAR intervention, referee Farai Hallam reviewed the incident on the pitchside monitor and confirmed that the Hull defender had committed a holding offence.
However, the official subsequently ruled that Havertz had been in an offside position awarding Hull City an indirect free kick instead of giving Arsenal a penalty.
The decision immediately sparked debate but a closer examination of the laws suggests that the central issue was not whether Havertz was standing offside but whether he had committed an offside offence before Mendy fouled him.
Arsenal vs Hull: What happened between Nobel Mendy & Kai Havertz?
The controversy began when Havertz moved towards a delivery into Hull's penalty area with Mendy attempting to prevent the German international from reaching the ball.
Television replays showed the Senegalese defender holding Havertz's shirt prompting the video assistant referee, Michael Oliver, to recommend an on field review.
Hallam subsequently acknowledged the foul, initially raising Arsenal supporters' hopes that their team would receive a penalty.
Those celebrations quickly turned into frustration when the referee explained that Havertz had been offside during the attacking move.
Arsenal manager Mikel Arteta was visibly unhappy with the outcome, while questions emerged about the decision making process.
But was the offside position enough to invalidate Mendy's foul?
What does IFAB Law 11 actually say?
According to Law 11 of the International Football Association Board (IFAB), simply standing in an offside position does not constitute an offence.
A player must become actively involved in play including by touching the ball, challenging an opponent or clearly interfering with an opponent's ability to play it.
More importantly, the law specifically addresses situations in which a player standing offside is fouled before becoming involved in active play.
In that scenario, the foul takes precedence because it occurred before the offside offence.
The distinction creates two possible interpretations of the Arsenal incident:
- If Mendy pulled Havertz before the forward attempted to play the ball or challenged an opponent, Arsenal should have received a penalty
- If Havertz had already committed an offside offence before the shirt pull, the referee's decision to award Hull an indirect free kick would be justified
The order of the actions, rather than Havertz's position alone, therefore determines the correct decision.
Did VAR misinterpret the sequence?
Football rules analyst Dale Johnson questioned the decision arguing that Havertz had not yet committed an offside offence when Mendy pulled his shirt.
Under that interpretation, the defender's holding offence occurred first and should have resulted in a penalty for Arsenal.
The Premier League Match Centre confirmed that VAR had identified both the holding offence and Havertz's offside position during its review.
However, the official explanation did not resolve the central controversy surrounding the precise timing of the two actions.
The incident consequently raises a wider question about VAR's interpretation of football's laws:
Can a technically correct offside position assessment still lead to the wrong final decision?
In this case, the answer could be yes if the foul occurred before Havertz became actively involved in play.
Nobel Mendy: From a historic Hull City transfer to Premier League controversy
The incident also placed the spotlight firmly on one of Hull City's most prominent African signings.
The 21 year old Senegalese centre back joined the Tigers from Rayo Vallecano in August 2026 in a deal reported at approximately €25 million.
As Foot Africa previously reported, Mendy's arrival represented a club record transfer, reflecting Hull's determination to strengthen their defence following promotion to the Premier League.
His introduction to English football had initially been impressive.
On 22 August, Mendy scored on his Premier League debut against Manchester United, helping Hull secure a memorable 2-0 victory.
Against Arsenal, however, the Senegalese defender attracted attention for a very different reason.
Arsenal win, but the refereeing debate remains
Despite the disputed penalty decision, Arsenal eventually secured a 1-0 victory.
Captain Martin Odegaard broke the deadlock in the 72nd minute, reacting to a rebound following an effort from Noni Madueke.
The result ensured that Arsenal collected all three points, preventing the incident from directly costing the Gunners victory.
Nevertheless, the controversy remains significant because of the distinction between two concepts that are frequently confused, being in an offside position and actually committing an offside offence.
Africa
Today at 07:05
Europe
Today at 05:37
Africa
Today at 05:17
Africa
Yesterday at 12:15
Europe
Yesterday at 03:37
Africa
01 November 2026
Europe
28 October 2026
Africa
25 October 2026